baslets.blogg.se

It -is- true that this book is detailed enough to give you working knowledg My TA work is almost done, so I count this over once I finished Chapter 13. However, given how it was presented, I think I am now convinced that this is not the best book to learn classical mechanics. This book has been considered a "standard" since I was an undergraduate, and I never really questioned it since I always thought this sort of topic to be limited in variations (apart from making the questions very difficult). My TA work is almost done, so I count this over once I finished Chapter 13. I would encourage people to use Morin instead of this book especially for self-learning or being undergraduate and getting to this topic for the first time.more yes it is better than learning for the classic book Classical Mechanicsby Goldstein but still not a very good one compared to Introduction to Classical Mechanics: With Problems and Solutions by Morin. The important thing at this level is the introduction to Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism which is not presented in organized and step by step way. it gives an intro to the calculus of variation in Chapter 6 and oscillation in chapter 3, what is the hell was the author thinking when he did this?

The organization of the book is a big issue. the book is good as an introductory book but cannot be used alone as the need to be supplemented by lectures is necessary. This is the most popular book used in introducing classical mechanics (non-Newtonian approach) for physics undergraduate courses. it gives an intro to the calculus of variation in Chapter 6 and oscillation in chapter 3, what is the hell was the author thinking when he did this? the important thing at this level is the introduction